Top 10 AIOps Platforms 2026: AI-Powered Observability

In 2026, AIOps has finally grown up.

For years, AIOps platforms promised to fix broken on-call rotations and eliminate alert fatigue. Instead, they often delivered nothing more than fancy anomaly detection that created different kinds of noise—alerting on everything, explaining nothing, and automating little.

That changes this year. The shift from predictive analytics to agentic AI has fundamentally transformed AIOps. The best platforms in 2026 don't just detect anomalies—they draft fixes, optimize costs, correlate root causes across distributed systems, and in some cases, heal issues automatically before humans even notice.

At the same time, the lines between traditional AIOps and AI observability are blurring. Modern platforms must handle two distinct challenges:

1. AI-Powered Observability (AIOps): Using AI to monitor traditional infrastructure, applications, and cloud-native systems—detecting anomalies, correlating incidents, and automating responses.
2. LLM Observability: Monitoring AI systems themselves (large language models, agents, embeddings). If you're looking to monitor your LLM applications specifically, see our guide on integrating OpenObserve with OpenLIT for comprehensive LLM telemetry using OpenTelemetry.

This guide focuses on AI-Powered Observability and AIOps platforms—tools that use artificial intelligence to make your infrastructure smarter, your incidents shorter, and your teams more efficient.

For broader observability context, explore our companion guides: Top 10 Observability Platforms, Top 10 Open-Source Observability Tools, and Enterprise Observability Strategy.

Here are the Top 10 AIOps Platforms in 2026 that are actually delivering on the promise of autonomous, intelligent operations.

Jump to Comparison Table

---

1. OpenObserve (The AI-Native Foundation)

OpenObserve approaches AIOps differently than legacy vendors. We believe that AI-powered observability is only as powerful as the engine that drives it. Like any LLM, the more comprehensive and high-quality data you feed it, the more intelligent it becomes.

While competitors force teams to sample, tier, or drop telemetry data to control costs—starving AI models of critical context—OpenObserve provides petabyte-scale, full-fidelity observability at 140x lower storage costs than tools like Splunk or Datadog. This architectural advantage creates a massive, uncompromised dataset for AI to analyze.

We then layer our O2 AI Agent on top of this massive dataset, giving you an "always-on" SRE capable of deep semantic analysis across your entire observability stack—not just sampled fragments.

Why OpenObserve Wins in 2026

OpenObserve has built a comprehensive AI-powered observability stack with three key capabilities that work together to transform incident response:

1. MCP Server: Interact with Your Observability Platform Using LLMs

OpenObserve provides native MCP (Model Context Protocol) server integration, enabling seamless interaction with your observability platform using LLMs like Claude. This integration allows developers and SREs to:

• Query observability data directly from AI tools, IDEs (VS Code, Cursor), or chat platforms
• Access logs, metrics, traces, and dashboards through natural language commands
• Automate investigative workflows by integrating OpenObserve into your AI-powered development environment
• Bring intelligence to where teams already work—no context switching required

2. OpenObserve AI Assistant: Your Intelligent Observability Copilot

The OpenObserve AI Assistant is an intelligent copilot deeply integrated with the platform, enhancing user productivity, streamlining troubleshooting, and accelerating insights from log, metric, and trace data:

• Fast Q&A: Get instant answers about any OpenObserve data, component, or best practice without manual query writing
• End-to-End Traceability: Query, correlate, and diagnose issues across all telemetry types (logs, metrics, traces) in natural language
• Automation Ready: Generates SQL, Python, and VRL scripts on-the-fly for custom analysis and automation workflows
• Error Reduction: Validates queries and scripts before execution to minimize trial-and-error cycles and ensure accurate results

3. O2 SRE Agent: Using LLMs to Improve Incident Response Time

The O2 SRE Agent is your always-on Site Reliability Engineer, designed to optimize the core SRE metrics that matter: MTTD (Mean Time to Detect) and MTTR (Mean Time to Resolve).

Core SRE Responsibilities Handled by the Agent:

• Production reliability monitoring and alerting
• Automated incident response and root cause analysis
• Capacity planning and scaling recommendations
• Preparation for failure modes (disk, network, service degradation)

The Challenge: Wasted investigation time from missing correlation, leading to poor RCA quality and L1/L2-level support issues.

How LLMs Help:

Root Cause Analysis (RCA) Quality:

• Ensures clarity by providing contributing factors, root causes, and concrete prevention steps
• Improves RCA classification and quality through incident analysis and historical learning

Incident Correlation:

• Analyzes past incidents to surface relevant runbooks automatically
• Maps service dependencies to understand blast radius and impact
• Groups related alerts algorithmically to reduce noise
• Surfaces historical patterns to predict and prevent future incidents

Key Features:

• AI-SRE Agent: Automated root cause analysis with AI assistance—identifies root causes, action items, timelines, and more
• Alert Graph Visualization: Service topology view during incidents to understand dependencies
• Multi-Signal Correlation: Correlates alerts, logs, metrics, and traces for comprehensive incident context
• Historical Learning: Improves MTTR and RCA accuracy from past incident data

Transparent AI Decision-Making:

Unlike black-box AIOps systems that provide conclusions without context, the O2 SRE Agent delivers complete transparency. After the AI generates an incident analysis report, engineers can review exactly what data it analyzed, how it reached its conclusions, and which signals it correlated.

The incident report includes:

• Correlated logs, metrics, and traces that contributed to the root cause determination
• Alert graphs showing service topology and affected dependencies
• Service impact analysis highlighting which components and users were affected
• Timeline visualization of how the incident propagated through your system

This visibility builds trust and helps engineers learn from the AI's decision-making process. Instead of blindly accepting AI recommendations, teams can validate conclusions, understand correlation patterns, and improve their own troubleshooting skills over time. When the AI identifies a root cause, you're not left wondering "How did it figure that out?"—you can see the complete evidence chain.

OpenObserve Strengths / Pros

• Lowest Total Cost of Ownership (TCO): Ingestion-based pricing with no per-seat, per-host, or hidden fees—predictable scaling at 140x lower storage costs
• Unified data platform: Logs, metrics, traces, and business events in one place, eliminating tool sprawl
• Native OpenTelemetry support: Prevents vendor lock-in with open standards and seamless GenAI instrumentation
• Three-layer AI stack: MCP integration + AI Assistant + SRE Agent working together for autonomous operations
• Transparent AI reasoning: Complete visibility into AI decision-making with access to correlated data, alert graphs, and evidence chains
• Self-hosted or cloud: Deploy on-prem for compliance or use managed cloud—full flexibility
• SQL + PromQL querying: Flexible analytics familiar to most engineering teams

OpenObserve Risks / Cons

• Community maturity: While the core platform is battle-tested, the AI agent community is newer compared to established vendors

Best For

Teams who want comprehensive AIOps with full-fidelity data but refuse to pay the "AI tax" charged by legacy SaaS vendors. Ideal for cost-conscious enterprises, compliance-heavy industries needing self-hosting, and platform teams managing both traditional infrastructure and AI workloads.

Try OpenObserve: Start Free Trial (14 days, no credit card) | Self-Host on GitHub

---

2. Dynatrace (The Causal AI Leader)

Dynatrace remains the heavyweight champion of enterprise AIOps, powered by its Davis® AI engine—the most sophisticated causal AI system in observability. Unlike competitors that rely on correlation (essentially educated guessing), Dynatrace uses deterministic causal analysis to pinpoint exact root causes across complex distributed systems.

Why Dynatrace Wins in 2026

Hypermodal AI Architecture: Dynatrace has successfully integrated three AI paradigms—Causal AI (for precision root-cause analysis), Predictive AI (for capacity forecasting and anomaly prediction), and Generative AI (for natural language remediation guidance)—into one cohesive engine. This combination delivers both accuracy and actionability.

Automatic Topology Mapping: The OneAgent technology automatically discovers and maps dependencies across monolithic applications, microservices, databases, and cloud infrastructure. Davis AI uses this topology graph to trace causality chains—understanding that a database timeout caused an API slowdown, which triggered user-facing errors.

Dynatrace Strengths / Pros

• Extremely low false-positive rates: Causal AI eliminates noisy alerts by identifying actual root causes, not just symptoms
• Business impact analysis: Ties IT incidents directly to revenue loss, customer experience degradation, and SLA violations
• Enterprise-grade governance: Strong RBAC, compliance features, and multi-tenancy for large organizations
• Proven at scale: Trusted by Fortune 500 companies managing petabyte-scale, mission-critical systems

Dynatrace Risks / Cons

• Most expensive platform: Premium pricing that can be prohibitive for mid-sized companies or high-volume workloads
• Complex configuration: Davis AI's advanced features require expertise to tune and optimize
• Limited LLM observability: Focuses on traditional AIOps—less specialized for monitoring AI/ML models themselves

Best For

Large enterprises needing battle-tested causal AI with proven precision for complex, hybrid environments. Ideal for organizations where incident costs (downtime revenue loss) justify premium tooling.

---

3. Datadog (The Ecosystem Leader)

Datadog's Watchdog AI has evolved from simple anomaly detection into an intelligent assistant embedded across their massive product suite. With Bits AI, their generative AI assistant, Datadog now provides conversational troubleshooting during live incidents.

Why Datadog Wins in 2026

Bits AI Conversational Troubleshooting: During an outage, engineers can ask Bits: "Why did latency spike in the checkout service?" Bits queries logs, metrics, traces, and security data, then surfaces correlations like: "A security scan triggered database connection pool exhaustion, causing timeout cascades."

Cross-Silo Correlation: Because Datadog owns an extensive product portfolio (APM, Infrastructure Monitoring, Security, RUM, Logs, Synthetics), Watchdog excels at spotting patterns across traditionally siloed datasets. It can correlate a frontend JavaScript error with a backend database query slowdown, for example.

Datadog Strengths / Pros

• Best-in-class UX: Industry gold standard for dashboard usability and intuitive navigation
• 700+ integrations: Massive ecosystem means AI models have telemetry from every corner of your stack
• Unified platform: Single vendor for APM, infrastructure, security, and real-user monitoring reduces tool sprawl

Datadog Risks / Cons

• Bill shock risk: Enabling advanced AI features (Bits AI queries, Watchdog alerts) often incurs extra costs on top of already complex usage-based pricing
• Data sampling pressure: To control costs, teams often sample logs and traces, reducing AI model accuracy
• Vendor lock-in: Proprietary agents, query language, and data formats create high switching costs

Best For

Cloud-native enterprises prioritizing ecosystem breadth and UX who need unified visibility across infrastructure, applications, and security. Best for teams already invested in the Datadog ecosystem.

---

4. New Relic (Code-Level AIOps)

New Relic, one of the original APM pioneers, has evolved its platform to include AI Monitoring and New Relic AI, a generative assistant focused on helping developers fix performance issues at the code level.

Why New Relic Wins in 2026

Code-Level Remediation: New Relic's AI is uniquely focused on developers—it doesn't just say "this API is slow," it suggests specific code optimizations: "This N+1 database query pattern in UserService.getOrders() is causing latency. Consider batch loading with JOIN or implementing query caching."

Simplified Consumption Pricing: While still usage-based, New Relic's per-GB pricing model is more transparent than Datadog's multi-dimensional billing, making cost forecasting easier.

New Relic Strengths / Pros

• Developer-first AI: Speaks "code," not just "ops"—actionable fixes instead of generic alerts
• Full-stack visibility: Strong connection between frontend user experience (RUM) and backend code performance
• AI-powered query assistant: Helps engineers write NRQL queries in natural language
• Anomaly detection: AI identifies unusual patterns in APM traces, infrastructure metrics, and logs

New Relic Risks / Cons

• Cost scales with data volume: High-cardinality traces and verbose logs drive up ingestion costs quickly
• Limited hybrid deployment: Primarily SaaS-focused with minimal self-hosted options
• Proprietary query language: NRQL creates learning curve and switching costs

Best For

Developer-centric teams needing AI-powered code performance analysis. Ideal for organizations where application performance directly impacts user experience and revenue.

---

5. Splunk Observability Cloud (Security + AIOps Convergence)

Now part of Cisco, Splunk leverages its dominant position in Security (SIEM) to deliver unique AIOps capabilities—correlating security events with infrastructure performance to detect threats masquerading as "normal" incidents.

Why Splunk Wins in 2026

SecOps Convergence: In 2026, many "outages" are actually security incidents. Splunk's AI can detect whether a performance spike is a DDoS attack, a cryptomining breach, or legitimate traffic—something traditional AIOps platforms miss.

Splunk AI Assistant: A powerful conversational interface for their proprietary SPL query language, enabling engineers to investigate complex scenarios without memorizing syntax.

Splunk Strengths / Pros

• Hybrid infrastructure support: Excellent for on-premise, air-gapped, and highly regulated environments
• Security context: Unmatched visibility into security-driven performance issues
• Mature analytics: Decades of log analytics expertise translated into AI-powered insights
• Integration depth: Deep integrations with Cisco networking and security products

Splunk Risks / Cons

• Prohibitively expensive storage: Storing the data volume required for effective AI analysis is notoriously costly in Splunk
• Slower search speeds: Compared to modern columnar stores (like OpenObserve), Splunk's search on massive historical datasets can lag
• Proprietary SPL language: Creates learning curve and vendor dependency

Best For

SecOps and compliance-heavy teams needing unified security and observability. Ideal for enterprises where security incidents and infrastructure failures must be investigated together.

---

6. Grafana Cloud (Visualization-First AIOps)

Grafana has expanded its legendary LGTM stack (Loki, Grafana, Tempo, Mimir) with AI-powered features including an SRE Agent for root-cause analysis and integrations with Anthropic Claude for conversational troubleshooting.

Why Grafana Wins in 2026

SRE Agent: Grafana's AI assistant queries multiple data sources (Prometheus, Loki, Tempo), correlates incidents, and suggests remediation steps—all while maintaining Grafana's signature visualization clarity.

Open ecosystem flexibility: Unlike proprietary platforms, Grafana works with dozens of backends (Prometheus, OpenObserve, Elasticsearch, InfluxDB), giving teams vendor-neutral AIOps capabilities.

Grafana Strengths / Pros

• Best-in-class dashboards: Unmatched visualization flexibility and customization
• Anthropic integration: Native support for monitoring Claude API usage and costs
• Flexible deployment: Self-hosted LGTM stack or fully managed Grafana Cloud
• Open standards: Works with OpenTelemetry, Prometheus, and open-source backends

Grafana Risks / Cons

• Fragmentation risk: Self-hosted LGTM setups require managing multiple components (Loki, Tempo, Mimir)
• Limited native AI features: AIOps relies on plugins and integrations—not deeply embedded in core platform
• Pricing complexity: Grafana Cloud add-ons (per-host Kubernetes monitoring) can inflate costs unexpectedly

Best For

Visualization-first teams who want AI-powered insights without sacrificing dashboard flexibility. Ideal for organizations committed to open-source ecosystems.

---

7. BigPanda (The Event Correlation Specialist)

BigPanda isn't a monitoring tool—it's an AIOps Event Hub that sits above existing observability platforms (Splunk, Datadog, Prometheus, Nagios), ingests their alerts, and uses AI to correlate them into manageable incidents.

Why BigPanda Wins in 2026

Fixing Tool Sprawl: Most enterprises in 2026 have 5-15 monitoring tools. BigPanda uses AI to aggregate alerts from all sources, reducing alert noise by 95%+ through intelligent correlation and deduplication.

Generative AI Enrichment: Automatically adds business context to technical alerts using GenAI: "This server failure impacts the checkout service used by 40% of weekend transactions."

BigPanda Strengths / Pros

• Tool-agnostic: Works with whatever monitoring stack you already have
• Extreme noise reduction: Industry-leading alert correlation algorithms
• Faster incident response: Surfaces critical incidents while suppressing redundant alerts
• Business service mapping: Connects infrastructure events to customer-facing services

BigPanda Risks / Cons

• Another tool in the stack: Adds complexity and cost on top of existing monitoring infrastructure
• No telemetry collection: Doesn't collect metrics, logs, or traces—only processes alerts from other tools
• Effectiveness depends on integrations: Quality of correlation depends on quality of input from other platforms

Best For

Enterprises with tool sprawl who need AI-powered alert correlation without replacing existing monitoring investments. Ideal for organizations suffering from alert fatigue.

---

8. Elastic Observability (Search-Powered AIOps)

Elastic brings the power of vector search and RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) to AIOps. Their AI Assistant can query your internal runbooks, wikis, and documentation to provide context-aware troubleshooting guidance.

Why Elastic Wins in 2026

Bring Your Own Knowledge: Feed your internal documentation, runbooks, and postmortems into Elastic's AI Assistant. When an alert fires, the AI references your specific procedures and institutional knowledge—not generic troubleshooting steps.

Elasticsearch Relevance Engine (ESRE): Industry-leading full-text and vector search makes finding "needles in haystacks" faster than traditional observability platforms.

Elastic Strengths / Pros

• Unmatched search capabilities: Full-text, vector, and hybrid search across all telemetry types
• Customization: Deep control over how AI models search and rank results
• Hybrid deployment: Self-hosted or managed Elastic Cloud options
• Knowledge grounding: AI advice grounded in your organization's documented best practices

Elastic Risks / Cons

• Operational complexity: Managing Elasticsearch clusters (even managed ones) requires dedicated expertise
• Resource-intensive: Java-based stack demands significant compute and memory resources
• Storage costs: Elastic's indexing architecture can be expensive at scale compared to columnar storage

Best For

Teams with rich internal documentation who want AI troubleshooting grounded in organizational knowledge. Ideal for enterprises prioritizing search performance and customization.

---

9. LogicMonitor (Hybrid Infrastructure AIOps)

LogicMonitor is the quiet giant of hybrid AIOps—purpose-built for organizations running a mix of legacy on-premise infrastructure and modern cloud-native systems. Their Edwin AI is designed to understand both SNMP traps from aging hardware and Kubernetes metrics from microservices.

Why LogicMonitor Wins in 2026

Hybrid IT Expertise: Edwin AI is uniquely capable of correlating incidents across vastly different technology generations—connecting a mainframe database slowdown to a cloud application timeout, for example.

Agentless Monitoring: Easier to deploy in restricted enterprise environments where installing agents on legacy systems is problematic or forbidden.

LogicMonitor Strengths / Pros

• Best-in-class hardware support: Unmatched coverage for physical networks, storage arrays, and network devices
• Early warning system: Predictive analytics that forecast failures before they occur
• MSP-friendly: Multi-tenancy features designed for managed service providers
• Automated topology discovery: Maps dependencies across hybrid infrastructure automatically

LogicMonitor Risks / Cons

• Less cloud-native: Feels dated compared to modern Kubernetes-native platforms when managing ephemeral container workloads
• UI limitations: Interface isn't as polished as newer entrants like Datadog or OpenObserve

Best For

Enterprises with hybrid infrastructure (on-prem + cloud) who need AIOps that understands both legacy systems and modern architectures. Ideal for MSPs managing diverse client environments.

---

10. AppDynamics (Cisco's Business-Aware AIOps)

AppDynamics, now under Cisco's portfolio, is a proven enterprise APM platform with Cognition Engine—an AI system focused on connecting application performance to business outcomes and revenue impact.

Why AppDynamics Wins in 2026

Business Transaction Intelligence: Unlike infrastructure-focused AIOps, AppDynamics maps technical incidents to business transactions: "This database slowdown is impacting 15,000 checkout transactions per hour, projected revenue loss: $45,000."

Cisco Integration Advantage: Deep integration with Cisco's networking, security, and collaboration products enables correlation across traditionally separate IT silos.

AppDynamics Strengths / Pros

• Business context: Ties technical metrics directly to revenue, customer experience, and business KPIs
• Deep APM capabilities: Transaction tracing, code-level diagnostics, and user journey mapping
• Cognition Engine: AI-powered root cause analysis with business impact assessment
• Enterprise readiness: Strong governance, RBAC, and compliance features

AppDynamics Risks / Cons

• Limited open standards support: Less emphasis on OpenTelemetry compared to newer platforms
• Opaque enterprise pricing: Costs become unpredictable at scale with complex licensing
• Cisco dependency: Best value comes from using broader Cisco ecosystem products

Best For

Enterprise businesses needing to connect application performance directly to revenue impact and business KPIs. Ideal for retail, finance, and e-commerce organizations where downtime = lost revenue.

---

Comparison Table: AIOps Platforms 2026

Platform	Primary AI Strength	Best For	Deployment Options	OpenTelemetry Support	Pricing Model
OpenObserve	MCP + AI Assistant + SRE Agent (3-Layer Stack)	Scale & Cost Efficiency	Self-hosted / Cloud / Hybrid	Native	Ingestion-based (lowest TCO)
Dynatrace	Causal AI (Deterministic Root Cause)	Enterprise Reliability	Cloud / Self-hosted	Supported (OneAgent preferred)	Host/Event-based (premium)
Datadog	Watchdog + Bits AI (Cross-Silo Correlation)	Cloud-Native Ecosystem	Cloud (SaaS only)	Supported (proprietary preferred)	Usage-based (complex/high)
New Relic	Code-Level AI (Developer Focus)	Application Performance	Cloud (SaaS only)	Native	Usage-based (per GB)
Splunk	Security + Observability Convergence	SecOps Teams	Cloud / Self-hosted	Supported	Data volume (expensive)
Grafana	SRE Agent + Visualization	Open Ecosystem & Dashboards	Self-hosted / Cloud	Native	Per-host + add-ons
BigPanda	Event Correlation & Noise Reduction	Multi-Tool Alert Aggregation	Cloud (SaaS only)	N/A (Event Hub)	Per-node
Elastic	Vector Search + RAG (Knowledge Grounding)	Custom Documentation Search	Self-hosted / Cloud	Supported	Resource-based (variable)
LogicMonitor	Hybrid Infrastructure AI (Edwin)	On-Prem + Cloud / MSPs	Cloud / Self-hosted	Limited	Per-device
AppDynamics	Business Transaction Intelligence (Cognition Engine)	Revenue-Impact Analysis	Cloud / Self-hosted	Limited	Enterprise licensing

---

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

What is AIOps?

AIOps (Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations) uses machine learning, natural language processing, and causal AI to automate observability workflows—anomaly detection, root-cause analysis, alert correlation, and incident remediation. Modern AIOps platforms go beyond traditional monitoring by using AI to reduce alert noise, predict failures, and automate responses.

What's the difference between AIOps and AI observability?

AIOps uses AI to monitor traditional infrastructure and applications (servers, databases, APIs). AI observability refers to monitoring AI systems themselves (LLMs, agents, embeddings). The best platforms in 2026, like OpenObserve and Datadog, handle both—using AI to monitor everything while also providing visibility into AI/ML workloads.

Do I need AIOps if I already have monitoring tools?

If your monitoring tools generate too many alerts, lack root-cause analysis, or require manual correlation during incidents, AIOps adds significant value. Platforms like BigPanda can layer on top of existing tools to reduce noise, while unified platforms like OpenObserve can replace fragmented stacks entirely.

How does causal AI differ from anomaly detection?

Anomaly detection (traditional AIOps) identifies statistical outliers: "This metric is unusual." Causal AI (Dynatrace Davis) determines exact cause-and-effect: "This database timeout caused API latency, which triggered user-facing errors." Causal AI reduces false positives and provides actionable root causes instead of vague alerts.

What is the O2 SRE Agent in OpenObserve?

The O2 SRE Agent is OpenObserve's always-on Site Reliability Engineer assistant that automates root cause analysis with AI assistance. It provides contributing factors and concrete prevention steps for incidents, correlates alerts across logs/metrics/traces, maps service dependencies, and learns from historical incidents to improve RCA quality over time.

Unlike black-box AIOps tools, the O2 SRE Agent provides complete transparency: after generating an incident report, engineers can review exactly what data the AI analyzed—including correlated logs, metrics, traces, alert graphs showing affected services, and timeline visualizations. This visibility helps teams validate AI conclusions and learn from the decision-making process.

---

Conclusion: The Future of AIOps is Agentic

In 2026, AIOps has finally evolved from "better anomaly detection" to autonomous, agentic operations. The best platforms don't just tell you something is wrong—they explain why, suggest fixes, and in advanced cases, heal systems automatically.

Key takeaways for choosing an AIOps platform:

1. Causal AI beats correlation: Platforms like Dynatrace that use deterministic causal analysis deliver more precise root-cause identification than statistical anomaly detection alone.

2. Full-fidelity data matters: AI models are only as good as the data they access. OpenObserve's 140x lower storage costs enable teams to feed AI agents complete telemetry—not sampled subsets that miss edge cases.

3. Multi-layer AI delivers more: OpenObserve's three-layer approach (MCP integration + AI Assistant + SRE Agent) provides more comprehensive automation than single-purpose tools.

4. Transparent AI builds trust: Unlike black-box systems, OpenObserve's O2 SRE Agent shows exactly what data it analyzed and how it reached conclusions—helping engineers validate recommendations and learn from AI decision-making.

5. OpenTelemetry is table stakes: Platforms with native OTel support (OpenObserve, Grafana, New Relic, Elastic) future-proof your stack and prevent vendor lock-in.

6. Deployment flexibility is critical: For regulated industries, self-hosted options (OpenObserve, Elastic, Grafana) are non-negotiable for compliance and data sovereignty.

7. Cost transparency drives adoption: Complex, opaque pricing models create budget unpredictability. OpenObserve's ingestion-based pricing delivers the most predictable TCO.

By decoupling storage from compute and offering petabyte-scale retention at 140x lower costs, OpenObserve ensures your AI agents (MCP integration, AI Assistant, and SRE Agent) have the deep context they need to actually solve problems, not just report them. And unlike black-box AIOps tools, OpenObserve provides complete transparency—you can review the correlated logs, metrics, traces, alert graphs, and service dependencies the AI analyzed, building trust and helping your team learn from every incident.

Try OpenObserve: Start Free Trial (14 days, no credit card) | Download Now

---